Socfin Group
Palm oil assessment- Latest update: November 2024
- Next scheduled: November 2025
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the palm oil supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Landbank (oil palm)185,449 hectares
-
Market cap:306,400,000 USD
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:SLXSF.PK
-
Bloomberg ticker:SOCFI LX Equity
-
LEI:No LEI
-
RSPO member?Yes
-
Other initiatives:Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO), International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC)
-
Activities:Oil palm cultivation, milling, palm kernel crushing, palm oil refining
-
Locations:Indonesia (Aceh), Cambodia,Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, Sao Tome & Principe, Sierra Leone
-
Headquarters:Luxembourg
-
Related companies:The company is also assessed on SPOTT Natural Rubber Socfin Group
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Socfin Group – November 2024
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 24 / 34 70.6%
- Policy: 60.5 / 74 81.8%
- Practice: 48.7 / 64 76.1%
- Self-reported: 7.7 / 64 12.1%
- External: 25 / 64 39.1%
- Certified: 16 / 64 25%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership8 / 11 72.7%
- Organisation: 4 / 6 66.7%
- Policy: 2 / 2 100%
- Practice: 2 / 3 66.7%
- Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
- External: 1 / 3 33.3%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company meets this indicator through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company has also published a sustainable palm oil policy which covers all palm oil operations.
-
2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
The company has published a sustainable palm oil policy which applies to all suppliers.
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
The company has a sustainability department, managed by the Head of Sustainability.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports that the board of directors has overall responsibility for sustainability.
-
0 / 1
5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?
-
6. Reports gender balance of board members?
0 (0%) - The company reports that it has no women on the board of directors.
-
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
[Externally verified] Earthworm and TFA.
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
The company has partnered with the Earthworm Foundation to support the implementation of its responsible management policy. It has also collaborated with research institutes and universities to improve the quality of palm oil seeds.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company has published its latest sustainability report for 2023.
-
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
The company states that its sustainability report has been prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards: extended compliance option. However, no proper reporting standards are used. It has also not responded to CDP questionnaires.
-
11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?
This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.
-
0 / 1
12. Climate risks assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability13.75 / 16 85.9%
- Organisation: 10 / 12 83.3%
- Policy: 1 / 1 100%
- Practice: 2.8 / 3 91.7%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 3 25%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
- Certified: 2 / 3 66.7%
-
13. Lists countries and operations?
Sierra Leone, Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, Sao Tomé-and-Principe, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Indonesia - (8 plantations and 23 mills), Côte d'Ivoire, Nigeria, and Cameroon - (3 palm kernel-crushing plants).
-
0 / 1
14. Lists countries sourcing from?
-
15. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?
185449 - The RSPO ACOP 2023 states that the company has 185,449 ha of total land area managed/controlled for oil palm.
-
16. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?
130215 - The company reports that it has 130,215 ha of total oil palm planted area.
-
17. Scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from scheme/plasma smallholders.
-
18. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
0 - The RSPO ACOP 2023 states that the company has zero ha of unplanted area.
-
19. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
43943 - The RSPO ACOP 2023 states that the company has 43,943 ha of total conservation set-aside area including High Conservation Value (HCV) area.
-
20. Maps of estates/management units?
The company has KML maps available for all its estates. It also has provided the maps to RSPO and states that no new concessions were acquired after the submission of the maps to RSPO.
-
21. Maps of all scheme smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from scheme/plasma smallholders.
-
0 / 1
22. Maps of all third-party supplying plantations?
-
23. Number of company-owned mills?
23 - The company reports that it has 23 palm oil mills.
-
24. Names and locations of company-owned mills?
The names and locations of all the company's 23 palm oil mills are available on GFW.
-
25. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and third parties?
The company reports that 12 out of 23 mills source from company-owned operations, one mill source from only third parties while the remaining mills source from both company-owned operations and third parties.
-
26. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and third-parties?
The company reports that 91.6% of all FFBs sourced by company-owned mills come from company-owned operations while the remaining 8.4% FFBs come from third parties.
-
27. Number of third party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
28. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
29. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
30. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
31. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.
-
32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
33. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
34. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?
The company has already achieved 100% traceability to plantation level.
-
35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?
The company reports that 100% of FFB supply is traceable to the plantation level. An additional point has been added due to the company's RSPO Identity Preserved certifications for eleven of its mills.
-
36. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
37. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.
-
38. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?
The company reports 100% traceability to plantation for all three of its crushers (SAFACAM, SOGB, and Okomu Oil Palm PLC).
-
Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives9.48 / 13 72.9%
- Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
- Policy: 2 / 2 100%
- Practice: 6.5 / 10 64.8%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 10 4.8%
- External: 6 / 10 60%
- Certified: 0 / 10 0%
-
39. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?
[Externally verified] 2004 - The company has been a member of RSPO (since 06 December 2004).
-
40. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?
2011 - The company joined RSPO membership in 2004 and became certified in 2011.
-
41. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?
The company has submitted its latest RSPO ACOP 2023.
-
42. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?
[Externally verified] 100% - The company reports 100% of RSPO-certified areas in its RSPO ACOP 2023.
-
43. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?
[Externally verified] 100% - The company reports 100% RSPO-certified mills. Data as of 2023.
-
44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years?
2024 - The company has already achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates and mills.
-
45. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities within 5 years?
2022 - The company has already achieved 100% RSPO-certification of all palm product processing facilities.
-
46. Percentage of scheme smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from scheme/plasma smallholders.
-
47. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?
This indicator is disabled as the company has no scheme/plasma/associated smallholders or outgrowers.
-
48. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?
0% - The company reports that 0% of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders, outgrowers and third-party FFB suppliers are RSPO-certified.
-
49. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?
[Externally verified] 100% - The company reports that 100% of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) are RSPO-certified as crushers are supplied 100% by own operations which are 100% certified.
-
50. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?
The company sells 48.18% of RSPO-certified palm oil through segregated or identity-preserved supply chains.
-
51. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?
The company reports that it processes/trades 0% of RSPO-certified palm oil through segregated or identity preserved supply chains.
-
52. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?
[Externally verified] The company reports that Socfindo sites are ISPO-certified and provide externally verified certificates.
-
53. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.
-
54. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?
[Externally verified] The company is certified under ISO 14001 and Bio-Organic.
-
Deforestation and biodiversity12 / 20 60%
- Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
- Policy: 7.5 / 12 62.5%
- Practice: 4.5 / 6 75%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
- External: 2 / 6 33.3%
- Certified: 2 / 6 33.3%
-
0 / 1
55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
-
0 / 1
56. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
-
57. Commitment to zero deforestation?
The company commits to no land clearing damaging primary forests or areas required to protect or enhance HCVs since November 2005, and no land clearing damaging HCVs or HCS forest since November 2018, through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to zero deforestation. This commitment has been in place since 2017.
-
58. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to zero deforestation. This commitment has been in place since 2017.
-
59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
The company commits to no land clearing damaging primary forests or areas required to protect or enhance HCVs since November 2005, and no land clearing damaging HCVs or HCS forest since November 2018, through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also defines deforestation as the removal of HCV and HCS areas and specifies any deforestation/conversion past 2017 will not be accepted.
-
60. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
The company defines deforestation for suppliers as the removal of HCV and HCS areas and specifies any deforestation/conversion past 2017 will not be accepted in supplier operations.
-
61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it uses the Starling monitoring system for continuous monitoring with very high-resolution satellite images. This tool is complemented by other satellite imagery platforms, such as Global Forest Watch (GFW) for all its concessions, and the RSPO Firewatch System and NASA FIRMS (Fire Information for Resource Management System) specifically for its palm oil concessions.
-
0 / 1
62. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
64. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
The company commits to restore ecosystems to their prior condition in cases of conversion within its own operations. This commitment has been in place since 2017.
-
66. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
The company commits suppliers to restore ecosystems to their prior condition in cases of conversion within their own operations. This commitment has been in place since 2017.
-
67. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
The company has developed and consistently oversees locally tailored action plans that encompass topics such as internal and external grievance management processes, supplier training and monitoring, community engagement and support. It has also established a stakeholder round table, comprising local companies and authorities, to implement an integrated conservation land use plan. However, the information is between two to five years old.
-
68. Biodiversity policy?
The company has a biodiversity strategy to protect primary forests, areas of HCS, HCV, peatland, and critical habitats. However, no time-bound target is provided.
-
0 / 1
69. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
-
70. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company has also identified various endemic, rare, threatened, or endangered species (according to the list of the IUCN).
-
71. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it identifies, maintains, protects, and supports the rehabilitation of peatland areas if it become degraded, as part of its commitment.
-
72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
The company only commits to protect wildlife and rare, threatened, endangered, and critically endangered species from poaching, hunting, and habitat loss in areas under its management.
-
73. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
The company only commits all suppliers to protect wildlife and rare, threatened, endangered, and critically endangered species from poaching, hunting, and habitat loss in areas under its management.
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments10 / 15 66.7%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 6 / 8 75%
- Practice: 4 / 7 57.1%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
- External: 3.3 / 7 46.4%
- Certified: 0 / 7 0%
-
74. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also recognises the concept of high conservation values. However, no commitment to conduct HCV assessments was found.
-
75. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
The company recognises the concept of high conservation values applicable to all suppliers. However, no commitment to conduct HCV assessments was found.
-
0 / 1
76. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
77. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?
[Externally verified] The HCV assessments for the Okomu Extension 1, Okomu Extension 2 concession, and Plantation Socfinaf Ghana Limited are available on the HCVRN website. The HCV assessment for PT Socfin Indonesia is available on both the RSPO NPP and HCVRN websites. However, it is unclear if these assessments cover all estates planted since January 2015.
-
78. High Conservation Value (HCV) or combined HCV/HCS management and monitoring plans for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?
[Externally verified] Management and monitoring plans for Okomu Extension 1 concession, Okomu Extension 2 concession, Plantation Socfinaf Ghana Limited, and PT Socfin Indonesia are publicly available. However, it is not clear whether these management and monitoring plans cover all estates planted since January 2015.
-
79. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to using licensed HCSA accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) in its own reporting.
-
80. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to only use licensed HCV assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's ALS.
-
81. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?
[Externally verified] HCV assessments of Okomu Extension 1 concession, Okomu Extension 2 concession, Plantation Socfinaf Ghana Limited, and PT Socfin Indonesia are available on the HCRN website and are reviewed as satisfactory. However, it is not clear whether these assessments cover all estates.
-
82. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to the high carbon stock (HCS) approach in its own reporting.
-
83. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to apply the HCS Approach, as defined by the HCS Approach Toolkit.
-
84. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
Carbon stock assessments for Okomu and PSG are available on the company's dashboard, but not on the HCVRN website.
-
0 / 1
85. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
-
86. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%).
-
0 / 1
87. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
-
88. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?
[Externally verified] SEIAs are available for multiple subsidiaries: PSG, Okomu, SAC, SOGB, and PT Socfin Indonesia.
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions15.25 / 21 72.6%
- Organisation: 3 / 6 50%
- Policy: 7 / 8 87.5%
- Practice: 5.3 / 7 75%
- Self-reported: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
- Certified: 4 / 7 57.1%
-
89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to no planting on peat of any depth in its own reporting.
-
90. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to no planting on peat of any depth.
-
91. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
1905 - The company reports that its total peatland planted area is 1,905 ha. Data as of 2023.
-
92. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
The company reports that its peatland planted areas have not increased from 2022 to 2023.
-
93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to best management practices for soils and peat in its own reporting.
-
94. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to best management practices for soils and peat.
-
95. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
96. Commitment to zero burning?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to no burning in its own reporting.
-
97. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to no burning.
-
98. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it uses the Starling monitoring system for continuous monitoring with very high-resolution satellite images to manage fire and deforestation incidents caused by external factors in its concessions. This tool is complemented by other satellite imagery platforms, such as Global Forest Watch (GFW) for all its concessions, and the RSPO Firewatch System and NASA FIRMS (Fire Information for Resource Management System) specifically for its palm oil concessions.
-
99. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?
The company recorded 264 cases of fires due to internal and external causes in 2023.
-
0 / 1
100. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?
-
0 / 1
101. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
-
102. GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports the total GHG emissions intensity as 1.08 (T CO2e/ton palm product) in 2023.
-
0 / 1
103. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
-
0 / 1
104. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
-
105. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports no change in its total GHG emissions intensity from 2022 (1.08 T CO2e/T CPO) to 2023 (1.08 T CO2e/T CPO).
-
106. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
The RSPO requires companies to assess their GHG emissions through the Palm GHG calculator. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also uses the PalmGHG calculator to calculate GHG emissions.
-
0 / 1
107. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?
-
Water, chemical and pest management21.25 / 24 88.5%
- Organisation: 1.5 / 2 75%
- Policy: 10 / 11 90.9%
- Practice: 9.8 / 11 88.6%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 11 6.8%
- External: 1 / 11 9.1%
- Certified: 8 / 11 72.7%
-
108. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
The company reports an average water consumption intensity of 1.06 m3/T in 2023. The figure falls below the African industry standard (1.12 m3/T of processed FFB) but exceeds the Asian industry standard (0.96 m3/T of processed FFB). However, no time-bound commitment was reported to reduce water use intensity.
-
109. Water use intensity?
1.06 - The company reports an average water consumption intensity of 1.06 m3/T in 2023.
-
110. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
The company reports a decrease in average water consumption intensity from 2022 (1.13 m3/T) to 2023 (1.06 m3/T).
-
111. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?
The company commits to maintain BOD and COD levels within legal limits.
-
0 / 1
112. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?
-
113. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
114. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.
-
115. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to protect natural waterways through buffer zones.
-
116. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company has also formulated a strategy to manage riparian buffer zones and protect surface water, aligned with RSPO criteria, which is gradually implemented on all plantations.
-
117. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to minimise the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides in its own reporting.
-
118. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
The company only commits to suppliers to optimise the usage of fertilisers.
-
119. Commitment to no use of paraquat?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to not use paraquat in its own reporting.
-
120. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to not use paraquat.
-
121. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides in its own reporting.
-
122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.
-
123. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals in its own reporting.
-
124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.
-
125. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
The company publishes details of toxic products used. However, the figures are not in per ha or per tonne of oil produced.
-
126. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also publishes a list of organic fertilisers and reports that 740,216 tons and 778 m3 of organic fertilisers were used in 2023.
-
127. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it has implemented an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach.
-
128. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also has a waste management system that encompasses the collection, transport, recycling, and disposal of both industrial and household waste in accordance with its environmental management system (EMS).
-
Community, land and labour rights31.75 / 35 90.7%
- Organisation: 4.5 / 5 90%
- Policy: 18.5 / 21 88.1%
- Practice: 8.8 / 9 97.2%
- Self-reported: 0 / 9 0%
- External: 8.8 / 9 97.2%
- Certified: 0 / 9 0%
-
129. Commitment to human rights?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in its own reporting.
-
130. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
131. Progress on human rights commitment?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also provides human rights training to its security teams to ensure employee safety and organises awareness campaigns to reduce the potential risk of harassment.
-
132. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
-
133. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to respect indigenous and local communities' rights in relation to FPIC only.
-
134. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to respect legal and customary land tenure rights in relation to FPIC.
-
135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to respect legal and customary land tenure rights in relation to FPIC.
-
136. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) in its own reporting.
-
137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to respect FPIC.
-
138. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%).
-
139. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
[Externally verified] The company maintains regular communication with stakeholders to enhance community relations and collaborates with 'Earthworm' to engage with local stakeholders. However, the information is between two to five years old.
-
140. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain requirements for addressing land conflicts. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also reports that it addresses land conflicts through its grievance system. However, no further details are reported.
-
141. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
142. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to ensure food security for local communities. However, it is unclear if this includes measures beyond the provision of palm oil for domestic consumption.
-
143. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
144. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to provide essential community services and facilities in its own reporting.
-
145. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also provides electricity, water supply, and health facilities to village communities and promotes the employment of local residents from neighbouring areas.
-
146. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The also company commits to provide business opportunities for local communities. For example, by partnering with local SMEs and businesses.
-
147. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company commits to eight fundamental ILO conventions.
-
148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to eight fundamental ILO conventions.
-
149. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
150. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender in its own reporting.
-
151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to no discrimination but does not specifically address employment and/or occupation-related discrimination based on gender.
-
152. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also provides training on the prevention of discrimination to its security team to enhance the security of its employees.
-
153. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
4787 (8.3%) - The company reports the temporary employees as 4,787 (8.3%) in 2023.
-
154. Reports gender balance of employees?
14367 (24.92%) - The company reports 14,367 (24.92%) women employees in 2023.
-
155. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The also company reports that Decent Living Wages (DLW) applicable to its operations have been established and validated by RSPO, then it will be implemented. However, it is unclear commitment that all workers are paid a living wage.
-
156. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?
The company reports that Decent Living Wages (DLW) applicable to its operations have been established and validated by RSPO, then it will be implemented. However, it is unclear commitment that all workers are paid a living wage. This policy applies to all suppliers.
-
157. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
158. Reporting of salary by gender?
The company reports a 100% male-to-female salary ratio in 2023. However, it does not align with GRI reporting standards.
-
159. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to address health and safety at work for all workers in its own reporting.
-
160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to address health and safety at work for all workers.
-
161. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
162. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
7.5 - The company reports an injury rate of 7.50 in 2023. Calculated as recordable injuries x 200,000/total working hours.
-
163. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
2 - The company reported two work-related fatalities in 2023.
-
Smallholders and suppliers6.75 / 10 67.5%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2.5 / 4 62.5%
- Practice: 4.3 / 6 70.8%
- Self-reported: 2.3 / 6 37.5%
- External: 2 / 6 33.3%
- Certified: 0 / 6 0%
-
164. Commitment to support smallholders?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company has also published a commitment to support smallholders.
-
165. Programme to support scheme smallholders?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company conducts awareness and training sessions for smallholders and subcontractors and provides them with decision-making and technical support. However, the type of smallholders is unclear.
-
166. Percentage of scheme smallholders involved in programme?
0 (0%) - The company reports that it supports zero integrated smallholders through its program in 2022.
-
167. Programme to support independent smallholders?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company conducts awareness and training sessions for smallholders and subcontractors and provides them with decision-making and technical support. However, the type of smallholders is unclear.
-
168. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?
1485 - The company reports that it supports 1,485 independent smallholders through its program in 2022.
-
169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company reports that it requires suppliers to comply with its responsible management policy and provides training and assists with decision-making.
-
170. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
92.8% - The company reports that 92.8% of suppliers have been assessed and engaged in compliance with the company's policy and legal requirements.
-
171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
The company reports that suppliers may be excluded for noncompliance if it does not adopt remedial actions to correct failures. However, the exact criteria for exclusion are unclear, and the timeframes are not disclosed.
-
0 / 1
172. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?
-
0 / 1
173. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
-
174. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
175. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
176. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
177. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
178. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
179. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
Governance and grievances5 / 7 71.4%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 4 / 5 80%
- Practice: 1 / 2 50%
- Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
- External: 1 / 2 50%
- Certified: 0 / 2 0%
-
180. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company makes this commitment through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption in its own reporting.
-
181. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.
-
182. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it has appointed a Compliance Officer at the group's headquarters to enhance training and prevent corruption across all its subsidiaries.
-
0 / 1
183. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
184. Whistleblowing procedure?
The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on whistleblowing procedures. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also has a whistleblowing policy including whistleblower protection.
-
185. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company adheres to this criteria through the RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank (100%). The company also has a grievance management system open to all stakeholders.
-
186. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
The company provides details of complaints and grievances such as date, status, progress, and subject. However, the data is over five years old.
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
No date
Certified Companies (Principles and Criteria) - RSPO - WEBPAGE
-
March 2022
Responsible Management Policy
-
No date
Socfin Group 2023 RSPO ACOP
-
2023
Sustainability Report 2023
-
2023
Annual Report 2023
-
No date
Our Members - Earthworm - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Our Partners - Tropical Forest Alliance - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Partnership with Earthworm - Socfin Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Locations - Socfin Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Plantations - Socfin Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Dashboard - Socfin Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Universal Mill List - GFW - WEBPAGE
-
No date
RSPO Palm Oil Mills - GFW - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Traceability - Socfin Group - WEBPAGE
-
2022
Fresh Fruit Bunches (FFB) Procurement Report
-
2022
Palm Kernel (PK) Procurement Report
-
2022
Palm Kernel (PK) Procurement Report - Okomu
-
2022
Palm Kernel (PK) Procurement Report - Safacam
-
2022
Palm Kernel (PK) Procurement Report - SOGB
-
No date
Certifications - Socfin Group - WEBPAGE
-
March 2023
Monitoring of Certificates
-
2020
Policy Implementation Plan
-
No date
FAQ - Socfin Group - WEBPAGE
-
2017
HCV Plantation Socfinaf Ghana Limited - HCVRN - WEBPAGE
-
November 2016
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Socfin Indonesia
-
2016
Okomu's Extension 2 Concession - HCVRN - WEBPAGE
-
2016
Okomu's Extension I Concession - HCVRN - WEBPAGE
-
2016
PT Socfin Serdang Bedagai and Batubara Region - HCVRN - WEBPAGE
-
2016
Full HCV Assessment Summary - Okomu Extension 2 Concession
-
2016
Public Summary Report - Assessment of High Conservation Values in Parts of Okomu's Extension I Concession
-
2017
Public Summary Report - High Conservation Value Assessment for Plantation Socfinaf Ghana Limited
-
May 2017
Carbon Stock Assessment Report for Plantation - Socfinac Ghana Limited (PSGL)
-
2016
Carbon Stock of the Extension 2 Concession - Okomu
-
December 2016
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) - Okomu Oil Palm Company PLC
-
April 2018
Environmental and Social Impact Statement (ESIS) - Plantations Socfinaf Ghana (PSG) Limited
-
April 2004
Environmental Impact Assessment - Republic of Côte D'Ivoire
-
January 2011
Environmental Social and Health Impact Assessment - Malen Region
-
2021
Sustainability Report 2021
-
2022
Sustainability Report 2022
-
2021
Annual Membership Report
-
2023
Code of Conduct
-
March 2019
Supplier Code of Ethics
-
2020
Corporate Presentation
-
No date
Local Development - Socfin Group - WEBPAGE
-
2023
Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) Policy
-
March 2019
Employee and Corporate Code of Ethics
-
2019
Whistle Blowing Policy
-
No date
Grievance Management System - Socfin Group - WEBPAGE
Media monitor: Socfin Group
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
September 2023
Bolloré blacklisted over alleged rights violations on plantations in Africa and Asia
April 2022
Dutch Bank Pulls Out of Probe into Alleged Deforestation and Land Grab in Liberia
November 2021
At a certified palm oil plantation in Nigeria, soldiers and conflict over land
September 2021
Limbah PMKS PT Socfindo Seumanyam Diduga Cemari Lingkungan (PT Socfindo Seumanyam PMKS Waste Allegedly Polluting the Environment)
March 2021
Resistance against industrial oil palm plantations in West and Central Africa
March 2021
President Maada Bio makes further promise to resolve the Malen dispute soon
January 2021
Extension des terres du groupe Socfin: le FODER tire la sonnette d’alarme (Extension of the Socfin group's land: FODER sounds the alarm)
November 2020
African Peoples Tribunal faults transnationals operating in Africa
September 2020
Warga Kampung Tupah Aceh Tamiang Ditemukan Meninggal di Perkebunan PT Socfindo (Residents of Tupah Aceh Tamiang Village Found Dead on PT Socfindo's Plantation)
September 2020
SOCFIN and her subsidiary Okomu Oil Palm Company PLC rights violations in Edo State Communities/Villages: An S.O.S.
August 2020
Sungai Tercemar Limbah, Masyarakat Nagan Raya Laporkan Tiga Perusahaan Sawit ke Dinas Lingkungan Hidup (River Polluted with Waste, Nagan Raya Community Report Three Oil Palm Companies to the Environment Agency)
June 2020
https://news.mongabay.com/2020/06/how-the-legacy-of-colonialism-built-a-palm-oil-empire/
3
4
2
12
3
3
7
60
2
26
Media monitor: Socfin Group
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.
Download as CSV