Skip to content
Menu Search
Show media reports (6) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • Market cap:
    5,838,946,136 USD
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    PIRC IM Equity
  • LEI:
  • Website:
  • Media Monitor
    • ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.

Company assessment: Pirelli & C – March 2024

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 63.7% 67.5 / 106
  • Organisation: 14 / 26 53.9%
  • Policy: 38 / 51 74.5%
  • Practice: 15.5 / 29 53.5%
  • Self-reported: 9.5 / 29 32.8%
  • External: 5.3 / 29 18.1%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    9.25 / 10 92.5%
    • Organisation: 5.5 / 6 91.7%
    • Policy: 1 / 1 100%
    • Practice: 2.8 / 3 91.7%
    • Self-reported: 1.8 / 3 58.3%
    • External: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • N

      1. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment for all its operations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company has published a sustainable natural rubber policy which applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company has a Sustainability Strategic Committee, however, it is unclear which position has high-level responsibility excluding the board.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      The CEO has responsibility for sustainability within the board.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      12.2% - The company reports 12.2% of women in the senior management team.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      20% - The company reports that 20% of the board members are female and the remaining 80% are male.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?

      [Externally verified] The company is a member of IRSG, UNGC, WBCSD Tire Industry Project and WBCSD.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?

      The company collaborates with Birdlife International and BMW to protect 2,700 ha of rainforest in Indonesia and works to improve the living conditions of rubber producers. In 2022, it signed an agreement with local government in Mexcixo to help protect biodiversity and water in Guanajuato and Silao. Further, it has also collaborated with WBCSD to explore mobility solutions that are more sustainable, safer, cleaner and efficient. Additionally, it collaborated with natural rubber suppliers to train rubber farmers on sustainable farming methods and to provide scholarships to the children of those farmers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company's latest Integrated Annual Report was published in 2022.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      The company's Integrated Annual Report 2022 has been prepared in accordance with GRI 1: Foundation 2021. The company has also submitted CDP climate change, forest and water security questionnaires for 2023.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      11. Climate risks assessment available?

      The company has published a climate-related risk assessment including actual and potential impacts of climate change, metrics, targets and processes used to assess or manage climate risks. The information is not externally verified.

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    4 / 15 26.7%
    • Organisation: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • Policy: 2 / 3 66.7%
    • Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      12. Lists countries and operations?

      Manufacturing (Argentina, Brazil, China, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, Romania, Russian Federation, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States).

    • N
      0 / 1

      13. Lists countries sourcing from?

    • N

      14. Total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      15. Total natural rubber planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      16. Scheme smallholders/outgrowers planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      17. Unplanted area (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      18. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      20. Management plans for natural rubber production are available for all estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      21. Monitoring of management plan implementation available for all estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      22. Maps of all scheme/outgrower smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Maps of all third-party supplying industrial estates/management units?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. List of jurisdictions where sourcing from smallholders?

    • N

      25. Number of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      26. Maps of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      27. Number (or percentage) of company-owned processing facilities that source from company-owned operations and third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      28. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned processing facilities that come from company's own operations and third-parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      -

      29. Number of company owned natural rubber manufacturing facilities?

      The company has 18 natural rubber manufacturing facilities.

    • N
      -

      30. Maps of manufacturing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      31. Number of third party supplying processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Maps of all third party supplying processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      33. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying processing facilities that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      34. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying processing facilities that come from the supplying facilities' own operations and third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for manufacturing that comes from intermediary traders rather than directly from processing facilities?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      36. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to processing facility level?

      The company reports 100% of its natural rubber supply was traceable to processing facility level in 2021.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      37. Percentage of supply traceable to processing facility level?

      The company reports that 100% of its supply from tier 1 suppliers is traceable.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      38. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to industrial plantation level?

      The company provides a commitment to achieve full traceability to its direct and indirect suppliers, however, the commitment is not time-bound.

    • N

      39. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. Percentage of supply from third-party processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      41. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to jurisdictional level for smallholders?

      The company commits to achieve 100% traceability by 2025 to the jurisdictional level for tier-n, however, it is not clear if the commitment includes smallholder suppliers.

    • N

      42. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to smallholder at jurisdictional level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Percentage of supply from third party processing facilities traceable to smallholders at jurisdictional level?

  • Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
    3.5 / 5 70%
    • Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 1 50%
    • Practice: 2 / 3 66.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 2 / 3 66.7%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      44. Member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR)?

      [Externally verified] The company is a member of GPSNR. This has been verified via the GPSNR website.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      45. Submitted self-declaration form for the Sustainable Natural Rubber Initiative (SNR-i)?

      The company has submitted a self-declaration form for SNR-i.

    • N

      46. Percentage area (ha) FSC certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      47. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC FM certification of estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      48. Percentage of scheme/outgrower smallholders (ha) FSC-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      49. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC certification of scheme/outgrower smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      50. Percentage of natural rubber supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party natural rubber suppliers that is FSC-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations or processing facilities.

    • N
      0 / 1

      51. Percentage of all natural rubber products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is FSC-certified?

    • N

      52. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?

      [Externally verified] The company's Romanian operation has an ISCC certificate.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      54. Commitment to become 100% certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?

      All facilities are ISO 14001 certified. However, as the standard for ISO is not publicly available a higher score cannot be awarded.

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    4.25 / 10 42.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 7 42.9%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 2 62.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • External: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • N

      55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      56. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to protect natural ecosystems, prevent the overexploitation of natural resources, and avoid environmental impacts on ecosystems. However, a commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems was not found.

    • N

      57. Commitment to zero deforestation?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      58. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

      The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits all suppliers to no deforestation in its own reporting.

    • N

      59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      60. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

      The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. GPSNR defines natural rubber sourced from deforested areas or where HCVs have been degraded after 1 April 2019 to be non-conformant with its policy. In its own reporting, the company has also defined forests as HCV and HCS areas and specifies any deforestation/conversion past 1 April 2019 will not be accepted.

    • N

      61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      62. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

      The company reports that it trialled a deforestation monitoring system that uses satellite images and algorithms to identify deforestation hotspots in Indonesia. However, the information is between two and five years old.

    • N

      63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?

    • N

      65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      66. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?

      The company's policy, which applies to all suppliers, states it "advocates for the protection, preservation and restoration of primary and natural forests and areas of high environmental value". However, it is unclear if suppliers are required to restore deforestation/conversion within their own operations caused by themselves or third parties. The cut-off date beyond which suppliers would be obligated to restore deforested areas is not clearly stated.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      67. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that it has collaborated on a project with BMW and Birdlife to improve rubber cultivation practices, empower women and protect forests in Indonesia. Evidence is externally verified by quotes in the evidence from external parties. However, the information is between two and five years old.

    • N

      68. Biodiversity policy?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to protect biodiversity. However, the commitment is only in relation to protection within HCV/HCS set-aside areas.

    • N

      70. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      71. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      74. Commitment to protect areas from illegal activities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      76. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    3.5 / 5 70%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 4 87.5%
    • Practice: 0 / 1 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • N

      77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      78. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

      The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also communicates this in its own reporting.

    • N

      79. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      80. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      82. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to apply the HCS Approach, as defined by the HCS Approach Toolkit.

    • N

      83. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      84. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company does not provide a commitment to conduct social impact assessments in its operation; it only mentions EIA.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      86. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to conduct SEIAs.

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions
    6.75 / 9 75%
    • Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
    • Policy: 5 / 6 83.3%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 1 75%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 1 75%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • N

      88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits all suppliers to no planting on peat of any depth in its own reporting.

    • N

      90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      The company only commits to best management practices for peat that applies to all suppliers.

    • N

      94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      95. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      96. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits suppliers to reviewing practices in order to increase yield and mentions improving tree selection and trimming. However, a clear commitment to best tapping practices was not found.

    • N

      97. Evidence of best/sustainable tapping practices?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      98. Commitment to zero burning?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      99. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to zero burning.

    • N

      100. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations/jurisdictions?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      103. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions?

      The company commits to reduce GHG emissions (scope 1 and scope 2) by 42% by the year 2025 against a baseline of 2015.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. GHG emissions?

      The company reports its GHG emissions (scope 1 and scope 2) as 548,132 tons of CO2e for 2022.

    • N

      105. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      -

      106. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      107. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions?

      The company reports progress in the reduction of its GHG emissions (scope 1 and scope 2) from 636,190 (tonCO2e) in 2021 to 548,132 (tonCO2e) in 2022. However, information is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      108. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company uses the GHG Protocol to calculate GHG emissions.

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    6.25 / 11 56.8%
    • Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
    • Policy: 3 / 6 50%
    • Practice: 2.3 / 4 56.3%
    • Self-reported: 2.3 / 4 56.3%
    • External: 0 / 4 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      109. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company commits to reduce its water withdrawal by 43% by 2025 compared to a 2015 baseline. However, the commitment is not stated in intensity.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      110. Water use intensity?

      8.2 - The company reports water withdrawal intensity as 8.2 m3 per ton of finished product in 2022.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      111. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports a decrease in water withdrawal intensity from 8.5 m3 per ton of finished product in 2021 to 8.2 m3 per ton of finished product in 2022. However, information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      113. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?

      The company reports progress in the BOD level from 13.5 mg/l in 2021 to 7.7 mg/l in 2022 and the COD level from 45 mg/l in 2021 to 24.2 mg/l in 2022. However, the information is not externally verified.

    • N

      114. Treatment of effluents from processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      115. Treatment of effluents from manufacturing facilities?

      The company reports that it adequately treats industrial wastewater before discharging it into waterways. The information is not externally verified.

    • N

      116. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      117. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      118. Reducing odours from natural rubber processing or manufacuring facilities?

    • N

      119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      120. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits suppliers to reducing the use of chemicals. However, no mention of pesticides or fertilisers was found.

    • N

      121. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      122. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to not use paraquat.

    • N

      123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      124. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.

    • N

      125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      126. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      127. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      128. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      129. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    17.75 / 23 77.2%
    • Organisation: 4.5 / 5 90%
    • Policy: 12 / 13 92.3%
    • Practice: 2.8 / 7 39.3%
    • Self-reported: 2 / 7 28.6%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to human rights?

      The company makes this commitment through the the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0) and the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership and alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company commits to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in its own reporting.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      132. Progress on human rights commitment?

      The company reports that it has conducted a Human Rights Risk Assessment (HRRA) to identify the geographical areas and production categories that are at risk of human rights violations, has human rights management processes, and raises awareness among its workers and suppliers through information and training on the issue of human rights. Additionally, it has established a reporting channel for stakeholders to anonymously report any violation of human rights in operations.

    • N

      133. Commitment to respect Indigenous and local communities' rights?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      134. Commitment to Indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits suppliers to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

    • N

      135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.

    • N

      137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      138. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to respect FPIC.

    • N

      139. Details on Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      140. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      141. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      142. Supports the inclusion of women across natural rubber operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      143. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      144. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      145. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      146. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      147. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company commits to the ILO's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      149. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to the ILO's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      150. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company has conducted a human rights assessment which includes elements of human rights such as collective bargaining and child labour. The assessment covered 32 countries and details mitigation actions.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      152. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      153. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company only reports that it has a grievance reporting channel to address discrimination-related violations. The information is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      154. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      4.72% - The company reports that it has 1,480 (4.72%) temporary employees in 2022.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Percentage or number of women employees?

      14.7% - The company reports a total of 4,603 (14.70%) women in its workforce. Data as of 2022.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      156. Commitment to pay a living wage?

      The company only commits to pay minimum wage to its employees.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      157. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to pay the minimum wage to all workers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      159. Reporting of salary by gender?

      The company reports the gender pay gap across multiple countries in which it operates. However, the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men for each employee category, by significant locations of operation in line with GRI reporting was not reported.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      161. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to address health and safety at work for all workers.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      162. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC Chain of Custody certification (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also reports that it provides training on occupational health and safety to support its zero accidents objective. The information is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      163. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company reports a lost time index frequency rate of 0.20 in 2022. Calculated as recordable injuries x 100,000/total working hours.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      164. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      The company reports zero fatalities for its whole operation. Data as of 2022.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    5 / 11 45.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 5 60%
    • Practice: 2 / 5 40%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 5 10%
    • External: 1.5 / 5 30%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      165. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits to support smallholders in its own reporting.

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Percentage of supply from smallholders?

    • N

      167. Programme to support scheme smallholders/outgrowers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      168. Percentage of scheme smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      169. Programme to support independent smallholders?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that it has launched a project in Indonesia to train rubber smallholders in good agricultural practices (GAPs). Evidence is externally verified by quotes from collaborators BMW and Birdlife. However, the information is between two and five years old.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      170. Percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that it has included 36 farmers in a study on preventing diseases affecting rubber trees in 2019. Evidence is externally verified by the Earthworm Foundation. However, the information is between two and five years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Process used to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Number or percentage of smallholder suppliers engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      173. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company has conducted internal and external third-party audits for its suppliers to prioritise, assess and engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with its policy and legal requirements.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      174. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company reports that all tier 1 suppliers were engaged in 2021. However, the information is between two and five years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      175. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company has conducted a due diligence process based on the 'OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct' to check the compliance of suppliers with its code or policies. Further, if in case any non-compliance is found, the company can suspend or terminate business relations with those suppliers. However, the timeframe for action was not defined.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      176. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with natural rubber sourcing commitments?

      The company has published a plan to improve compliance across the supply chain but there is no target defined for all suppliers (inclusive of indirect suppliers) to be in compliance.

    • N
      -

      177. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      178. Percentage of supply coming from agroforestry?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    5.75 / 7 82.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 5 / 5 100%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      179. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      180. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      181. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company reports that it has conducted group-wide anti-corruption training to raise awareness among its employees. Further, it has established a whistleblowing channel to report any violations related to the code of ethics. However, the information is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      182. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

      The company discloses its management approach to tax through tax strategy and states that the board is responsible for its review.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      183. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has a whistleblowing policy including how whistleblowers can report unethical conduct and how they are protected.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      184. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company has its own grievance system open to all stakeholders.

    • N
      0 / 1

      185. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

      The company only reports the total number of cases recorded by the company.

Media monitor: Pirelli & C

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.

Show media reports
Last media reports:
Are we missing a story? Submit a media report
No article found for the selected categories.

0

0

0

2

0

1

0

2

0

1


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)